Shigeru Ban: The architect who tore helplessness into building
By Arindam Bose
When Disaster Became Architecture’s Real Brief
Earthquakes don’t negotiate. Wars don’t issue RFIs. Floods don’t wait for planning permissions.
Kobe, 1995. Rwanda, 1994. Tohoku, 2011. Christchurch, 2011. Turkey, Haiti, Sri Lanka, India, and beyond. In each of these places, before the cameras arrived and long after they left, people slept in plastic tents, on gymnasium floors, behind flimsy curtains that barely separated grief from exposure.
Most of the architectural world watched from a distance.
Shigeru Ban got on a plane.
Some architects design for magazines.
Some design for museums.
Shigeru Ban designs for the moment when a human being has lost everything.
He is the architect who turned helplessness into building.
And in doing so, he quietly redrew the mission of the profession itself.
The Philosophy: Paper as a Moral Decision
Dignity Before Design
Ban is best known for using the “humblest” materials in the room—paper tubes, cardboard, bamboo, scrap timber—and turning them into structures that carry not just loads, but dignity.
His choice of paper is not a stunt. It is ethics expressed through material:
Cost-effective: Cheaper than conventional systems, so it can be deployed fast and at scale for people who cannot pay architects’ fees
Recyclable: Returned to the material cycle once the crisis passes, minimizing waste in places already overwhelmed by debris.
Lightweight yet durable: When properly treated, paper tubes can carry significant loads, resist moisture, and meet fire and structural standards.
Simple and accessible: Can be handled, cut, and assembled by non-specialists, allowing refugees and local communities to build their own shelters.
For Ban, the real radical move is not technical; it is emotional. A “temporary” building can still feel like home. A relief shelter can still feel like it was designed for you, not simply at you.
Temporary Is Not Second-Class
Ban refuses the idea that temporary architecture is somehow lesser. In his universe, a paper church, a gym partition, or a refugee shelter is as serious—as deserving of care, detail, and beauty—as an art museum or corporate headquarters.
His Paper Partition System (PPS) is the perfect example:
Developed for gymnasiums and shelters after earthquakes, using vertical paper tubes and fabric panels to carve out private “rooms” on open floors.
After the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake alone, around 1,800 of these partitions were installed across more than 50 shelters, giving families privacy, control, and a sense of psychological safety.
The system has since been adapted for other disasters, including the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake and emergency responses abroad.
To most people, these are “just partitions”.
To Ban, they are the first walls of recovery.
Materials as Ethics, Not Style
Ban’s palette—paper, wood, bamboo, shipping containers, local stone—tells a philosophical story:
Local, low-tech solutions: Beer crates as foundations in Kobe, local debris and materials adapted in Turkey, India, Rwanda, and Sri Lanka.
High-precision timber: Interlocking wooden frames without metal connectors in projects like the Tamedia Office Building in Zurich and the Swatch/Omega Campus in Switzerland.
Recyclable pavilions: Giant paper grid shells that can be dismantled and fed back into material loops, as in the Japan Pavilion at Expo 2000 in Hanover.
For Ban, sustainability is not a marketing label. It is a refusal to waste money, matter, or human potential—especially when working with communities who have already lost everything.
The Origin Story: From Carpentry Dreams to Global Conscience
Shigeru Ban was born on August 5, 1957, in a small wooden house in Tokyo. His father worked at Toyota and loved classical music; his mother was a haute couture fashion designer who travelled to Paris and Milan for shows.
As carpenters regularly came to renovate the family home, young Ban watched, collected wood scraps, and built his own small structures. He first wanted to be a carpenter, then an architect, excelling in model-making and arts and crafts at school. A model house he designed in 9th grade was displayed as the best in his school.
Rugby nearly stole him away. He played at a high level and dreamed of Waseda University, famous for both rugby and architecture, training rigorously and learning technical drawing on the side. When his team lost early in a national tournament and his own path shifted, he committed fully to architecture.
He studied at Tokyo University of the Arts, then moved to the United States in 1977:
Southern California Institute of Architecture (SCI-Arc): an experimental environment in a converted warehouse, where he absorbed Case Study Houses and the resonance between Japanese tradition and Californian modernism.
Cooper Union, New York: transferred there in 1980 and studied under figures like John Hejduk, Peter Eisenman, and Bernard Tschumi. Hejduk, known as a “paper architect,” was particularly influential in showing that unbuilt work can carry powerful conceptual weight.
After a stint working with Arata Isozaki in Tokyo and a formative trip to see Alvar Aalto’s work in Finland—where he encountered regional materials and humanist modernism—Ban returned to Tokyo. In 1985, with no conventional office experience, he opened his own practice.
The first major turning point was not a glamorous commission. It was a headline: Rwanda, 1994. Two million refugees. Tents breaking down. Trees being cut at scale to replace poles, creating environmental collapse around camps.
Ban proposed shelters made from paper tubes to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). He was hired as a consultant, and the idea that had been “paper architecture” became literal, structural paper architecture on the ground.
The second turning point came a year later: Kobe, 1995. The Great Hanshin earthquake. Ban designed Paper Log Houses for Vietnamese refugees who were excluded from standard temporary housing, and a Takatori “Paper Church” to replace a destroyed Catholic church, built with student volunteers.
Out of these experiences, he founded the Voluntary Architects’ Network (VAN)—a loose, evolving NGO focused on disaster relief architecture that would follow earthquakes, tsunamis, and conflicts around the world.
From that moment on, Ban’s career became a double helix: high-profile cultural and commercial projects on one strand, and radical humanitarian invention on the other.
Eleven Icons: From Rubble to Landmarks
1. Paper Log House (Kobe and Beyond, 1995–)
After Kobe’s 1995 earthquake, hundreds of thousands were displaced. Six months later, many were still in terrible conditions. Ban’s answer: the Paper Log House.
Beer crates filled with sandbags formed a cheap, slightly raised foundation.
Cardboard tubes became structural walls.
Plywood and simple roofing completed the shell.
Eight people could assemble one house in about two days. The model was replicated in Turkey (1999), India (2001), Rwanda, and Kosovo, adapted to local materials and cultural habits.
2. Takatori “Paper Church” (Kobe, 1995)
A temporary church for a devastated Catholic community, built from paper tubes with the help of volunteers. It stood for years, becoming a symbol of both spiritual and architectural resilience, before being relocated to Taiwan.
3. Paper Tube Emergency Shelters & Paper Partition System (1994–ongoing)
From Rwandan refugee camps to Japanese gymnasiums, Ban’s core typology is simple: paper-tube frames, fabric or panel infill, local foundations.
UNHCR shelters in Rwanda offered alternatives to deforesting landscapes for tent poles.
Paper Partition Systems (PPS) reconfigured echoing halls into micro-rooms where families could sleep, grieve, and exist with some privacy.
These systems have since been deployed after earthquakes in Turkey, India, Haiti, Japan, and beyond.
4. Cardboard Cathedral (Christchurch, 2013)
When Christchurch’s 132-year-old Gothic cathedral collapsed in the 2011 earthquake, Ban was invited to design a temporary replacement. The result: a dramatic A-frame cathedral made from 98 cardboard tubes supported by shipping containers and a polycarbonate and timber shell.
It seats around 700 people, meets seismic and wind standards, and has become a new landmark for the city—proof that a “temporary” building can carry permanent emotional weight.
5. Japan Pavilion, Expo 2000 (Hanover)
For Expo 2000 in Hanover, Ban, working with Frei Otto, designed a vast grid-shell roof entirely from paper tubes, spanning an exhibition hall with minimal columns.
After the fair, the pavilion was dismantled and the paper recycled. It became an emblem of large-scale recyclable architecture and won several international awards.
6. Tamedia Office Building (Zurich, 2013)
In Zurich, Ban designed a seven-storey office building for media company Tamedia, where the primary structure is an all-wood frame with no steel connectors—giant timber joints instead of bolts.
The exposed timber grid behind glass facades turns the structure into both architectural expression and environmental statement: mass timber as a credible alternative to steel and concrete for urban offices.
7. Centre Pompidou-Metz (France, 2010)
With Jean de Gastines, Ban designed this regional branch of Paris’s Centre Pompidou as a series of gallery volumes under a sweeping, woven timber roof inspired by a Chinese bamboo hat.
Laminated timber strips form a hexagonal lattice covered by a translucent membrane. Inside, the galleries float under this canopy, with framed views out to the city of Metz. The building is now a major French cultural landmark.
8. Aspen Art Museum (Colorado, 2014)
Ban’s first permanent U.S. museum uses a woven wood-and-resin façade that acts like a basket around a glassy, open interior.
Visitors ascend to the rooftop terrace via an exterior grand stair and glass elevator, then move downward through the galleries—a reversal of the usual museum journey—and constantly reconnect with the mountain landscape.
9. Fujisan World Heritage Center (Shizuoka, 2017)
To honor Mount Fuji’s UNESCO World Heritage status, Ban designed an inverted conical building reflected in water, so the reflection reads as a full Fuji silhouette—“sakasa Fuji” made literal.
It is a museum not by mimicry of the mountain’s shape, but by amplifying its presence and symbolism.
10. Oita Prefectural Art Museum & SIMOSE / Shonai / Shishi Iwa (Japan, 2010s–2020s)
In Japan, Ban has extended his language into cultural and hospitality projects:
Oita Prefectural Art Museum (OPAM): A bright, flexible museum that opens itself to the city through large operable façades.
Shonai Hotel Suiden Terrace: A timber hotel floating over rice fields, connecting agrarian landscape with contemporary design.
Shishi Iwa Houses (Karuizawa): Intimate retreat hotels where timber, landscape, and silence weave together.
SIMOSE Art Garden Villa: A 2023 project that continues his exploration of wood, water, and small-scale poetic spaces.
11. Swatch/Omega Campus & DLT Timber Housing (2019–2024)
The Swatch/Omega Campus in Biel/Bienne is one of the largest timber buildings in the world, combining complex geometry with low-carbon structure.
More recently, Ban’s DLT Permanent Timber Temporary Housing received major wood design awards, showing how engineered timber can anchor both emergency and long-term housing strategies.
Prizes, Power, and a Redefined Benchmark
Ban’s award list reads like a parallel history of architecture shifting from object to obligation:
Early domestic recognition in Japan from the mid-1980s through the 1990s for exhibitions, houses, and the Paper Church and Paper Log House.
Global design awards for the Japan Pavilion, Naked House, and later projects like Haesley Nine Bridges Golf Clubhouse and Aspen Art Museum.
Time Magazine “Innovator of the Year” (2001): Recognizing his early integration of materials innovation and humanitarian practice.
Thomas Jefferson Medal in Architecture (2005) and Auguste Perret Prize (2011): Acknowledging his structural and technological ingenuity.
2014 Pritzker Architecture Prize: The decisive moment when the “Nobel of architecture” went to someone celebrated as much for refugee shelters and paper churches as for museums, marking an ideological shift in what counts as prize-worthy work.
Later honors such as The Asahi Prize, the World Economic Forum’s Crystal Award, the Princess of Asturias Award (Concord), and the Praemium Imperiale solidified his status as a global cultural figure, not just a design celebrity.
Collectively, these awards signalled a new standard: ambition in architecture is no longer measured only in height or cost, but in how deeply it serves those who need it most.
Teacher, Network-Builder, and Quiet Revolutionary
Alongside practice, Ban has systematically invested in teaching and transmission.
He has held professorships at Keio University, and more recently at Kyoto University of the Arts, while also serving as a visiting professor at institutions such as the Shibaura Institute of Technology and international universities.
Through the Voluntary Architects’ Network (VAN), he continues to mobilize students, young architects, and local communities into real-world projects—an education many architecture schools cannot replicate within studio walls.
His core message to the next generation is disarmingly simple:
Architects must take responsibility where markets do not.
Disasters and refugee crises are not side issues; they are central to what buildings are for.
Sustainable materials and low-cost systems are not compromises—they are opportunities to be inventive with purpose.
Why Shigeru Ban Matters to This Spotlight Series
This vertical began with Bjarke Ingels, the architect who bent the future into the present, turning optimism, diagrams, and hedonistic sustainability into spectacle with purpose.
It then moved to Liu Jiakun, the Pritzker laureate who turned architecture into humanity, making memory, grief, and humility central to design.
Shigeru Ban completes this initial triangle.
If Bjarke Ingels is the architecture of audacity—cities as prototypes of tomorrow.
If Liu Jiakun is the architecture of care—buildings as vessels for memory and emotional repair.
Then Shigeru Ban is the architecture of solidarity—the moment when the profession shows up first not for clients, but for the helpless.
He has proved that the same mind can design a global museum, a timber headquarters, a mountain museum—and a paper shelter built by refugees themselves.
In doing so, he changed the question from “How iconic is this building?”
to “Who gets to feel safe inside it?”
If this is the architecture of solidarity, Liu Jiakun is the architecture of care. For readers who want to see how humility, memory, and quiet revolution reshaped Chinese cities, read the previous spotlight on Liu Jiakun, the 2025 Pritzker laureate who turned architecture into humanity.- Liu Jiakun: The 2025 Pritzker Prize Winner Who Turned Architecture Into Humanity
Comments
Post a Comment